Possible £1,000 fine for moving traffic signage

3 Aug

A few weeks ago I came across yet another sign that had been placed needlessly on a pavement. I asked the workmen to move it into the coned-off layby. They told me that they couldn’t move it because it had been put there by a subcontractor and that it would be illegal for them or me to move it. To be honest I didn’t believe them and moved it anyway. I have since spotted the law they were referring to which states: “If a person without lawful authority or excuse—(a) takes down, alters or removes any fence, barrier, traffic sign or light erected or placed in pursuance of subsection (1) or (2) above, or (b) extinguishes a light so placed, he commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.” New Roads and Street Works Act 1991 (section 65). Level 3 on the standard scale is currently £1,000! Here is the sign before and after I committed the offense!

The road sign placed needlessly across the pavement over the textured pavement

The same sign moved so that it will  cause no obstruction to anyone

I did however also spot one useful clause in the official manual which tells contractors where to place all their cones and signs which states very clearly that “in no circumstances must the width of the footway be reduced to less than 1m, preferably not less than 1.5m” (chapter 8 clause D4.4.1). I will continue to move signs where this rule is being broken but will probably refrain from moving signs otherwise in future!

3 Responses to “Possible £1,000 fine for moving traffic signage”

  1. Graham Martin-Royle August 4, 2011 at 9:41 am #

    So you can get a £1,000 fine for moving a sign yet if you obstruct the pavement by parking a vehicle on it it appears that you aren’t bothered by the authorities at all. The priorities are wrong here.

  2. Peter Miller August 4, 2011 at 10:07 am #

    Indeed, one rule for motorists and another for everyone else. I can’t believe that this situation will be tolerated much longer. Lets continue to draw attention to all the issues and keep increasing the pressure.

  3. Murphy January 19, 2018 at 7:05 pm #

    It looks to me like there was no obstruction caused by the sign on the pavement, as it was placed in an area with lots of room to the side over a meter, but the slip access road left by the contractors for the access of works utility and supply vehicles is now blocked by the moving of the sign, if the is the attitude of the pedestrian rights group then it seem rather sad and picky.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: